On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:01:33 -0400
"Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kkeithle(a)redhat.com> wrote:
current 3.2.4-1.fc16 [i] 3.2.4-1.fc17 [i]
new... 3.2.4-1s.fc17 [s]
3.2.4-2.fc16 [i] 3.2.4-2.fc17 [s]
Whichever I go with I'd do the same thing for hekafs.
Seems fine. For HekaFS we do have another option, which would be to
bump the minor release:
I'm not quite ready to say it's 1.0 until we do something about quota
and shed the cloned transport bits (which requires getting the SSL patch
all the way into GlusterFS), but 0.8 and 0.9 are still valid.