On 11/17/2011 09:50 PM, Steve Traylen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi
<a.badger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were
> recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.). You can
> ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number
> policies as well. Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they
> change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all
> compatible. Other times they stick with the minor number since they've
> gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development.
Hi,
I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8.
Excellent thanks. I'll try this out tomorrow.
You did name the package correctly as "webob" rather than
"webobj" as you typoed above :)
One thing I would adjust is s/10/1.0/
About using v1.1.1, I think it's better to align
with what's used in Fedora, rather moving ahead to the
lastest and "greatest". This will be a relatively
short lived package in any case, as we'll probably
be updating the package proper in RHEL 6.3
I don't seem to be able to edit the wiki page.
I've just updated the wiki there:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenStack#OpenStack_in_EPEL
You should be able to also, if you have a fedora account.
One thing I noticed is that you need to shift-refresh
on a wiki page after login, for editing links to be apparent.
cheers,
Pádraig.