On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:43:28PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
Just a quick update, after some initial code review it was pointed out that the "latest" target would be better handled via a web end point that would auto-update with the data we're already providing via fedmsg as part of the release process. I'm going to refactor the code to only handle the N and N+1 stable release hosting and then work with the websites team to handle the "latest" download target.
Oh, that sounds like a good idea. Cool.