On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:37:32PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 04/27/2012 05:33 PM, Christian Berendt wrote:
>Hello Adam.
>
>On 04/27/2012 11:25 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>>#should this be keystone or identity?
>
>I would prefer using always the development name of the project,
>in this case keystone.
>
>Regards, Christian.
>
Thanks, Christian. I suspect that will work better with
documentation as well.
Pete Zaitcev also has pointed out that Swift probably won't play
nicely with this, as the URL scheme is pretty much driven by
Amazon, and it assumes a top level URL along the lines of
http://test-1235163301.kvm-rei.zaitcev.lan/testdata
https://s3.amazonaws.com/test-1235163301/testdata
http://kvm-rei.zaitcev.lan/test-1235163301/testdata
If Swift is the only exception, then we would probably be ok, since I
think our other top level name prefixes would be unique enough to not
clash with what Swift used at the top level
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|