On Fri, Mar 17, 2017, at 11:00 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Yes! we would love a UEFI test
Yes; conceptually most of the important scenarios we run through
for Workstation/Server (e.g. dm-crypt versus not) we should also
do for Atomic Host.
Adam, where is the git containing the input test suite for OpenQA?
and I think it would actually be good
to run the atomic-host-tests against these images assuming openQA is
the right tool for that job.
This part I don't quite agree with - remember the cloud images are
built with the installer ISO, and *those* are tested already with a-h-t.
There's going to be very little that's specific to the ISO path versus
the cloud image - which is part of the whole idea of sharing the
same exact ostree commit across them.
I thought openQA was more for interactive
install testing,
It does do more than that - however I see it as mostly valuable for testing
interactive Anaconda runs with the OpenCV approach.
IMO OpenQA's use of OpenCV is less interesting for testing
"headless/non-GUI"
bits, as is the case for Atomic Host. (We do of course have Cockpit
and the OpenShift web console, but both of those use Selenium[1][2] already)
[1]
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/blob/master/test/avocado/selen...
[2]
https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-console/blob/master/package.json#L64