On 01/15/2017 04:47 PM, Antonio Murdaca wrote:
On Jan 15, 2017 10:07 PM, "Dusty Mabe" <dusty(a)dustymabe.com
<mailto:dusty@dustymabe.com>> wrote:
On 01/13/2017 11:18 AM, Antonio Murdaca wrote:
>
>
>
> That sounds good. However, I didn't fully understand how to achieve that. Do
you mean that docker-latest shouldn't build docker-latest anymore but just require
"docker" and make a symlink out of it?
Exactly. in other words, it's just a placeholder for now.
With the power of git it won't be too hard to revive the
spec file to start building it again if we decide we need to.
Not sure that's gonna work well. The thing that's not really the point maybe. The
issue is there's really a lack of users for docker-latest and I'm questioning its
existence :).
Take F24 for instance, docker is at 1.10.3 while docker-latest is at 1.12.6. However,
nobody really test/use it resulting in me spending time updating it where it sounds like
nobody cares about it.
Your approach works for F25, both docker and docker-latest are at 1.12.x.
Maybe we should just wait for system containers and keep building it (on me).
I think the proposed strategy would work just fine, but, like you
said, the bigger question is "do we have any users for docker-latest
in Fedora"?
If we don't think so then scrapping docker-latest until demand rises
is ok with me. In the end you are the one doing the work so you have
the most say in what happens.
Dusty