On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 06:20:09PM +0000, Dusty Mabe wrote:
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
A few users have been requesting this as of late: [mail thread]
(
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.o...)
@mattdm had some questions in [this
mail](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedorapro...
copying them here:
So, we are already _making_ these; you can see them at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/compose — they're currently
under a compose ID with "Atomic" in the name, but AIUI that's going to
be split out. (I was worried that these might not include updates, but
that's fixed.)
Let's make a list of what needs to happen... here's what I can think
of:
1. Decide if we are okay with the level of automated testing these are
getting, or if we need human testing, or if we need more automated
testing
2. If we need more automated tests, someone needs to sign up for that
3. If we need human testing, someone needs to sign up to write the
release criteria
Much of this would be already covered in the current criteria, we
just would need to specify which criteria we consider to be
blocking. Those criteria can be found on the wiki [0]. These would
also impact the automated testing. We can write tests around the
criteria we're wanting to use. We currently do that with the openQA
tests.
4. And, someone would need to commit to doing the validation every
time.
4. Work with release engineering and infrastructure to adapt the Atomic
Host gating/release process for Cloud Base
5. Work with release engineering to get updated images to mirrors and
stuff
6. Someone needs to sign up to update the Vagrant Atlas index
7. Work with websites to update
cloud.fedoraproject.org to also offer
updated images. (I'm thinking the page should default to the latest,
but there should be some way to "scroll back" all the way to the GA
releases.)
8. Decide if we want to switch Cloud Base entirely to this
automatic process and eschew release milestones
If we decide to not follow the typical release milestones, we can
still have our list of "blocker" criteria we test against to
determine if an update gets releaseed.
I'm sure I'm missing something -- what else should be added?
``
I don't think anything here is missing. We should note however,
that signing up for testing/updating doesn't imply a life long
commitment, as many of these things will be covered by automated
testing *eventually*.
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/138
[0]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(also make sure to check Beta and Final)
// Mike
--
Fedora QA