Initial Draft of QA Docs

[Mike Ruckman]

As per the meeting today [0] here's an email detailing what I've put
together so far for QA/Testing documentation for ticket #41 [1]. It's
not a ton, but it somewhere to start from.

I'm keeping my working copies in my personal wiki space [2] for now. I
cut out the things I didn't think were relevant to Cloud from the
Release Criteria and created a draft of a test plan [3]. Some of the
areas are sparse on information because I wasn't sure what to put
down. 

On my list of things to do I still need to start on validation
matrices for each of the milestones - but I wanted to get some feedback
before putting all that together (Didn't want to spend too much time
going in the wrong direction if this isn't what you all had in mind).

Any feedback and edits would be great. Thanks!

// Mike

[0]
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-24/fedora-meeting...
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/41
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Cloud_Docs
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Cloud_Docs/Test_Plan

[Sandro "red" Mathys]

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Mike Ruckman <roshi(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  As per the meeting today [0] here's an email detailing what
> I've put
>  together so far for QA/Testing documentation for ticket #41 [1]. It's
>  not a ton, but it somewhere to start from.
>
>  I'm keeping my working copies in my personal wiki space [2] for now. I
>  cut out the things I didn't think were relevant to Cloud from the
>  Release Criteria and created a draft of a test plan [3]. Some of the
>  areas are sparse on information because I wasn't sure what to put
>  down.
>
>  On my list of things to do I still need to start on validation
>  matrices for each of the milestones - but I wanted to get some feedback
>  before putting all that together (Didn't want to spend too much time
>  going in the wrong direction if this isn't what you all had in mind).
>
>  Any feedback and edits would be great. Thanks! 
Well, so far, so good. Obviously the bigger chunk of work (e.g.
matrices, test cases) still lies ahead :)

Right now, I think some exceptions / additions should additionally be
mentioned regarding the Atomic Image (rpm-ostree, no yum, no
python/minimal package set, x86_64 only - the last one also goes for
the Big Data image(s)).

Keep up the good work!

-- Sandro