Got excited playing with the images linked from this article:
http://fedoramagazine.org/using-fedora-22-atomic-vagrant-boxes/
But I'm not yet up to speed with the atomic way of dealing with things and was looking for a more "standard" dev environment to play with F22.
Is there a non-atomic version with yum and/or DNF installed for a more traditional experience?
If not is there a good "getting started" guide for playing with the atomic version?
(ie install software this way. or run these commands to do X,Y,Z)
Have you looked at http://www.projectatomic.io/docs/gettingstarted/ for a guide to the "atomic way" with docker and kubernetes?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Derek Carter goozbach@friocorte.com wrote:
Got excited playing with the images linked from this article:
http://fedoramagazine.org/using-fedora-22-atomic-vagrant-boxes/
But I'm not yet up to speed with the atomic way of dealing with things and was looking for a more "standard" dev environment to play with F22.
Is there a non-atomic version with yum and/or DNF installed for a more traditional experience?
If not is there a good "getting started" guide for playing with the atomic version?
(ie install software this way. or run these commands to do X,Y,Z)
-- Derek aka Goozbach _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 03/19/2015 03:36 PM, Derek Carter wrote:
Got excited playing with the images linked from this article:
http://fedoramagazine.org/using-fedora-22-atomic-vagrant-boxes/
But I'm not yet up to speed with the atomic way of dealing with things and was looking for a more "standard" dev environment to play with F22.
Is there a non-atomic version with yum and/or DNF installed for a more traditional experience?
We do plan to have a standard cloud image for Vagrant as well. It looks like it was not included in the last few runs, but it was in the feature... Hope to get that sorted before the beta.
I think Matthew Miller said he added the kickstart file, need to see what else needs to be done there.
If not is there a good "getting started" guide for playing with the atomic version?
(ie install software this way. or run these commands to do X,Y,Z)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 03:54:24PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
I think Matthew Miller said he added the kickstart file, need to see what else needs to be done there.
Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
That someone _might_ be me, but if we want it before next week (and I think we do) it's probably best if it's someone else. :)
Then, someone needs to ask releng to add it to the list of outputs, and the work to make that happen needs to happen.
And it should get added to QA matrices so we at least _know_ if we're shipping it broken. :)
On 2015-03-19 15:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 03:54:24PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
I think Matthew Miller said he added the kickstart file, need to see what else needs to be done there.
Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
That someone _might_ be me, but if we want it before next week (and I think we do) it's probably best if it's someone else. :)
I'll give it a small spin, any test plans built for that?
Then, someone needs to ask releng to add it to the list of outputs, and the work to make that happen needs to happen.
I'll leave that to you when I've verified things
And it should get added to QA matrices so we at least _know_ if we're shipping it broken. :)
-- Derek
On 2015-03-19 15:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 03:54:24PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
I think Matthew Miller said he added the kickstart file, need to see what else needs to be done there.
Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
That someone _might_ be me, but if we want it before next week (and I think we do) it's probably best if it's someone else. :)
I'll give it a small spin, any test plans built for that?
Then, someone needs to ask releng to add it to the list of outputs, and the work to make that happen needs to happen.
I'll leave that to you when I've verified things
And it should get added to QA matrices so we at least _know_ if we're shipping it broken. :)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:19:33PM -0600, Derek Carter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 03:54:24PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
I think Matthew Miller said he added the kickstart file, need to see what else needs to be done there.
Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
Cool.
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-cloud-base...
You'll probably need to flatten the includes.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:41:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
I think Matthew Miller said he added the kickstart file, need to see what else needs to be done there.
Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
Cool. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-cloud-base... You'll probably need to flatten the includes.
Was someone able to test this? I'm not really a vagrant user....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Miller" mattdm@fedoraproject.org To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:31:13 AM Subject: Re: Non-atomic Vagrant images?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:41:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
I think Matthew Miller said he added the kickstart file, need to see what else needs to be done there.
Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
Cool. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-cloud-base... You'll probably need to flatten the includes.
Was someone able to test this? I'm not really a vagrant user....
If we have images, I can test them today.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:37:28AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
what else needs to be done there.
Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
Cool. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-cloud-base... You'll probably need to flatten the includes.
Was someone able to test this? I'm not really a vagrant user....
If we have images, I can test them today.
Did anyone get a chance to do anything here? I know last week was a busy week.
On 03/31/2015 11:53 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Did anyone get a chance to do anything here? I know last week was a busy week.
Indeed, and I was on PTO Monday/Tuesday. But I believe Ian has been working on this and has made progress.
Best,
jzb
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:34:30AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Did anyone get a chance to do anything here? I know last week was a busy week.
Indeed, and I was on PTO Monday/Tuesday. But I believe Ian has been working on this and has made progress.
Awesome -- thanks for the update.
On , Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:37:28AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>what else needs to be done there. Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
Cool. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-cloud-base... You'll probably need to flatten the includes.
Was someone able to test this? I'm not really a vagrant user....
If we have images, I can test them today.
Did anyone get a chance to do anything here? I know last week was a busy week.
I built and tested an image using Packer, but wasn't able to figure out what/where releng uses to build the images so I could verify that my non-flattened kickstart would work.
Do we now have images coming out of the build system? -- Derek
On 04/01/2015 03:18 PM, Derek Carter wrote:
On , Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:37:28AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>what else needs to be done there. >Someone needs to test that it works, and make any needed
changes.
Send me the kickstart file and I'll spin a version using packer
Cool.
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-cloud-base...
You'll probably need to flatten the includes.
Was someone able to test this? I'm not really a vagrant user....
If we have images, I can test them today.
Did anyone get a chance to do anything here? I know last week was a busy week.
I built and tested an image using Packer, but wasn't able to figure out what/where releng uses to build the images so I could verify that my non-flattened kickstart would work.
Do we now have images coming out of the build system?
Apologies for the delayed reply on this. I've made a few small tweaks to this initial file and pushed them to my github fork of spin-kickstarts here:
https://github.com/imcleod/spin-kickstarts/commit/e171dabdc57d208b08a5fca535...
Details are in the comments. In short, this adds some direct-root access points based on comments from @purpleidea, pulls in some ethernet device naming kernel options and adds in the dnf yum compat layer. I've flattened this file and done some test builds (minus the zeroing of blanks space, to save time during testing). All seems well. Most recent successful build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9396216
One final change, not captured in the kickstart, is to create a virtual disk that is 40 GB by adding the "--disk-size=40" option when calling the image creation in koji. Vagrant boxes use COW-type formats (either qcow2 for libvirt/kvm or sparse VMDK for virtualbox) and are meant for fiddling/testing. Having a lot of extra "virtual" space is helpful for this use case.
-Ian
-
Derek Carter -
Ian McLeod -
Joe Brockmeier -
Matt Micene -
Matthew Miller