dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` We're trying to balance the pros/cons of trying to have both kubernetes and origin in Fedora. We're trying to find a group of people interested in helping us maintain kubernetes within Fedora. This includes maintaining the rpm, fielding bug reports, making sure docs stay up to date, and trying to make sure upgrades work.
From our preliminary discussion i know a few people:
- @strigazi - @dimtheo - @jasonbrooks - @jberkus
Can we get other people who are interested in helping out add their name to this issue?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
dimtheo added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` i will talk to few people that i know and see if they are interested ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
tstclair added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I have already helped and will continue to.
- Added kubeadm to the main kube package - Added CNI package. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
sjenning added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I can help too, if needed. The kubernetes packaging is already done and tsclair is maintaining it. I figure most of the work would be around modifications/validation when there are new major upstream releases. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
suiwenfeng added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I am interested in kubernetes, please let me in. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sjenning well, we have to repackage based on Fedora or centOS base images with each Kubeadm release, so that's some ongoing work. There's also a bunch of other config stuff which doesn't currently work "out of the box" and would be nice to make work. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
strigazi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jberkus @dustymabe Can we have a list of working items to get things going?
1.7 is out, so we can start working on it. I could give @jchaloup a hand. Especially on testing.
If we put kube 1.7 in updates testing would be nice. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Dusty Mabe pagure@pagure.io wrote:
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` We're trying to balance the pros/cons of trying to have both kubernetes and origin in Fedora. We're trying to find a group of people interested in helping us maintain kubernetes within Fedora. This includes maintaining the rpm, fielding bug reports, making sure docs stay up to date, and trying to make sure upgrades work.
From our preliminary discussion i know a few people:
- @strigazi
- @dimtheo
- @jasonbrooks
- @jberkus
Can we get other people who are interested in helping out add their name to this issue?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287 _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
I am also interested.
dimtheo added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @dustymabe @jberkus i can deploy latest kube on fedora atomics and watch out for bugs ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` ok - what I'd like to do is offer up some suggestions on how the people in this group would like to collaborate with each other as well as with the rest of Fedora (including the atomic working group).
- do we create a new issue tracker/mailing list ? - do we piggy back on the atomic working group? - the worry here is that there is low signal to noise ratio and people that only care about kube will ignore/miss important messages. - do we do some hybrid?
Please help by adding your input.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` can we get a response from the people in this group for the above question?
also this update needs some testing/karma: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-48014f1cad ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think we use atomic_wg pagure for issues, and tag stuff with [kube]? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think we use atomic_wg pagure for issues, and tag stuff with [kube]? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
I think we use atomic_wg pagure for issues, and tag stuff with [kube]?
We do already have a `k8s` label, but I don't think that really helps people that are only interested in kubernetes stuff get just those notifications. AFAIK you can't watch a repository and *only* get notified when issues with a certain label (configurable by you) are updated. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Ah, limitations of pagure.
So, two solutions:
(1) we create an atomic_k8s repo (2) we ask folks to subscribe to the mailing list for automated notifications and filter by tags using their mail filters.
I'm pretty sure I know the answer already, but @jchaloup @tstclair @dimtheo @sjenning @suiwenfeng can you comment on what you'd prefer? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
sjenning added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I don't mind subscribing/filtering from the mailing list. I'm not sure what creating an atomic_k8s repo would mean. I'm not very familiar with Pagure yet. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
strigazi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think s/atomic_k8s/atomic-kubernetes/ is the easiest and I would say best option.
atomic-wg is a working group and the above group of people is interested in a specific subject. Let's go then for a new repo. People subscribed will receive notifications plus all information will be there for people maybe interested but not engaged that much.
Final thought, I would even go for a repo named kubernetes or kubernetes-wg. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
@sjenning I'm not sure what creating an atomic_k8s repo would mean.
It just means there is a separate issue tracker and you can get notifications only for kubernetes issues. This means less noise for people who don't care about anything other than kubernetes. I'm essentially trying to keep the people who care about kubernetes focused on that so that we hopefully have more engagement than we've had in the past.
@strigazi Final thought, I would even go for a repo named kubernetes or kubernetes-wg.
i'm thinking *kubernetes-sig* or *fedora-kubernetes-sig*, because it is a special interest group. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
strigazi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` kubernetes-sig sounds great, let's not add fedora we like centos too :) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287