dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@jberkus
Agreed, but if we're not supporting the older OSTree in any way, we've
effectively given users a very short time limit on when they need to rebase/upgrade, with
the possibility of being forced into it when the older OSTree unexpectedly breaks because
we're not testing it anymore, or if we're not updating it, because a new security
issue is announced. Either way, we are forcing users to upgrade on our timeline, not
theirs.
I'd actually like to have a grace period of like 30-60 days where we provide life
support for the previous release so that we're not "forcing" the issue as
much.
@jberkus
I'm happy to let that issue be a technical decision; I think our users would be OK
either way.
EXCEPT, if you go for "automated add remote + rebase", then we need to solve
the issue that you can't roll back from that reliably. Mind you, that's something
that we need to solve anyway.
rolling back would work, but you're "remote" would be wrong. I think this is
what you're referring to.
@jbrooks
I'm +1 to combining the ostree repos into one. There's nothing strange about
this, it's how the other atomic hosts operate. Fedora is the outlier in requiring
rebases between version upgrades.
We could do it, but I'd prefer not to. If there are clean points to "prevent
migrations" I'd prefer to just do that. One thing we could do is seed a new
ostree repo with the latest N-1 content and then start building from there, but it's
still more work than just creating a new repo from scratch.
@jbrooks
It'll also be much nicer for vagrant -- try vagrant init fedora/24-atomic-host -- it
doesn't work any more. And places like the kube ansible scripts, which call on atlas
for the vagrant boxes, need updates each time fedora atomic revs, where centos atomic is
always accessible at centos/atomic-host.
This discussion doesn't affect vagrant at all. The reason vagrant init
fedora/24-atomic-host doesn't work any more is because we "clean up" old two
week release disk images. I personally would like to keep them around, but i've been
met with resistance on that and don't have good enough reasons for doing so.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/231