=================================== #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud SIG ===================================
Meeting started by kushal at 19:01:35 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-03-18/fedora-meeting-... .
Meeting summary --------------- * rollcall (kushal, 19:01:45)
* Action items from previous meeting (kushal, 19:04:47)
* Maintaining Fedora docker images for f22 #97 (kushal, 19:06:22)
* Care and Feeding, Fedora Dockerfiles #84 (kushal, 19:14:53) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/84 (jzb, 19:16:32) * ACTION: jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles (jzb, 19:25:14) * ACTION: jzb (and others) update dockerfiles for dnf (jzb, 19:25:38)
* Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93 (kushal, 19:30:56) * LINK: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Cloud-Images/x86_64/Im... (dgilmore, 19:33:48) * LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/199747/26707461/ (dgilmore, 19:37:51) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93 (dustymabe, 19:41:15) * ACTION: kushal wil ask Lennart for more specific use case and details for #93 (kushal, 19:52:34) * LINK: http://cloud.fedoraproject.org/fedora-19.x86_64.qcow2 (dgilmore, 19:55:25) * LINK: http://cloud.fedoraproject.org/fedora-21.x86_64.qcow2 (dgilmore, 19:55:34) * LINK: http://cloud.fedoraproject.org/fedora/21/x86_64/SHA256SUM (dgilmore, 19:56:48)
* Atomic as separate spin (or, going the other way, main cloud edition)? https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/96 (kushal, 19:58:26) * ACTION: create proposal page on wiki for Atomic spin for f23 forward, call for vote on mailing list. (jzb, 20:06:44) * ACTION: jzb create proposal page on wiki for Atomic spin for f23 forward, call for vote on mailing list. (jzb, 20:07:04)
* Producing Updated Cloud/Atomic Images https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/94 (kushal, 20:07:27) * LINK: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21-20150309/ has the last updates compose (dgilmore, 20:11:09)
Meeting ended at 20:15:13 UTC.
Action Items ------------ * jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles * jzb (and others) update dockerfiles for dnf * kushal wil ask Lennart for more specific use case and details for #93 * create proposal page on wiki for Atomic spin for f23 forward, call for vote on mailing list. * jzb create proposal page on wiki for Atomic spin for f23 forward, call for vote on mailing list.
Action Items, by person ----------------------- * jzb * jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles * jzb (and others) update dockerfiles for dnf * jzb create proposal page on wiki for Atomic spin for f23 forward, call for vote on mailing list. * kushal * kushal wil ask Lennart for more specific use case and details for #93 * scollier * jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles * **UNASSIGNED** * create proposal page on wiki for Atomic spin for f23 forward, call for vote on mailing list.
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * jzb (79) * kushal (73) * dgilmore (70) * dustymabe (19) * oddshocks (19) * scollier (13) * mattdm (12) * zodbot (7) * jsmith (4) * rtnpro (3)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Kushal
Action Items
- jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles
On this item, I believe that the CentOS folks are interested in working together on Dockerfiles maintenance. Perhaps CentOS Dockerfiles and Fedora Dockerfiles could live together under Project Atomic?
Jason
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:04:22PM -0400, Jason Brooks wrote:
- jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles
On this item, I believe that the CentOS folks are interested in working together on Dockerfiles maintenance. Perhaps CentOS Dockerfiles and Fedora Dockerfiles could live together under Project Atomic?
That'd definitely be interesting. (As would a combined registry of images!)
On 03/18/2015 06:13 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:04:22PM -0400, Jason Brooks wrote:
- jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles
On this item, I believe that the CentOS folks are interested in working together on Dockerfiles maintenance. Perhaps CentOS Dockerfiles and Fedora Dockerfiles could live together under Project Atomic?
That'd definitely be interesting. (As would a combined registry of images!)
I'd be for this - any objections? I'm CC'ing Scott and Jim Perrin to see how they feel about it.
Refs: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/84 https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/97
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 08:44:19 AM Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 03/18/2015 06:13 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:04:22PM -0400, Jason Brooks wrote:
- jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles
On this item, I believe that the CentOS folks are interested in working together on Dockerfiles maintenance. Perhaps CentOS Dockerfiles and Fedora Dockerfiles could live together under Project Atomic?
That'd definitely be interesting. (As would a combined registry of images!)
I'd be for this - any objections? I'm CC'ing Scott and Jim Perrin to see how they feel about it.
Refs: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/84 https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/97
Do not forget that we have a huge divergence, dnf.
the dockerfiles need to be different between Fedora and CentOS. otherwise I think it is a good idea.
Dennis
-
Dennis Gilmore -
Jason Brooks -
Joe Brockmeier -
Kushal Das -
Matthew Miller