Testables for beta TC2

[Joe Brockmeier]

Hey all,

Some testables for y'all:

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Cloud-Images/x86_6...

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Docker/x86_64/

If you have time and inclination, testing would not go amiss.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

Are there test scenarios somewhere? I can't figure out how to get a
working image from the Docker tarball.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hey all,
>
>  Some testables for y'all:
>
>  https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Cloud-Images/x86_6...
>
>  https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Docker/x86_64/
>
>  If you have time and inclination, testing would not go amiss.
>
>  Best,
>
>  jzb
>  --
>  Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
>  jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
>  Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>  


-- 
OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-jou...

Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.

[Colin Walters]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015, at 03:03 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>  Are there test scenarios somewhere? I can't figure out how to get
> a
>  working image from the Docker tarball. 
We don't have automation for upload to the Hub AFAIK, and no do we have a
distribution-specific registry (though I think we should).

(A few minutes pass)

Ok, so things here are...suboptimal.  Here's a script you can use:

https://github.com/cgwalters/fedora-docker-image-import

We'll get Koji fixed to do something more useful by default.

[Robyn Bergeron]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Colin Walters <walters(a)verbum.org&gt; wrote:
>  On Mon, Mar 16, 2015, at 03:03 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> > Are there test scenarios somewhere? I can't figure out how to get a
> > working image from the Docker tarball.
>
>  We don't have automation for upload to the Hub AFAIK, and no do we have a
> distribution-specific registry (though I think we should).
>
>  (A few minutes pass)
>
>  Ok, so things here are...suboptimal.  Here's a script you can use:
>
>  https://github.com/cgwalters/fedora-docker-image-import
>  
Is that doing something different / using something different than the
image linked in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC2_Cloud?rd=T...

?

(That also lists all the various tests that can be run, though I'm not
sure if there is additional stuff above and beyond that is
docker-specific.)

-Robyn

>  We'll get Koji fixed to do something more useful by default.
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

I have plenty of my own stuff that builds on Fedora Docker images,
plus there's all the code in
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles that'll have to
work. I'll be testing the PostgreSQL one for sure.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Robyn Bergeron
<robyn.bergeron(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Colin Walters
> <walters(a)verbum.org&gt; wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015, at 03:03 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> >> Are there test scenarios somewhere? I can't figure out how to get a
> >> working image from the Docker tarball.
> >
> > We don't have automation for upload to the Hub AFAIK, and no do we have a
> distribution-specific registry (though I think we should).
> >
> > (A few minutes pass)
> >
> > Ok, so things here are...suboptimal.  Here's a script you can use:
> >
> > https://github.com/cgwalters/fedora-docker-image-import
> >
>
>  Is that doing something different / using something different than the
>  image linked in
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC2_Cloud?rd=T...
>
>  ?
>
>  (That also lists all the various tests that can be run, though I'm not
>  sure if there is additional stuff above and beyond that is
>  docker-specific.)
>
>  -Robyn
>
> > We'll get Koji fixed to do something more useful by default.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 
OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-jou...

Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.

[Colin Walters]

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015, at 06:33 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>  
>  Is that doing something different / using something different than the
>  image linked in
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC2_Cloud?rd=T...
Not a different image - the Koji one just generates a Docker image named
"Fedora-Docker-Base-22-20150316.x86_64:latest", whereas the above script allows
importing it as "fedora:22".

One can also "docker load" and "docker tag", then "docker
rmi", which may be easier.

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Robyn Bergeron
<robyn.bergeron(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Is that doing something different / using something different than
> the
>  image linked in
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC2_Cloud?rd=T...
>
>  ?
>
>  (That also lists all the various tests that can be run, though I'm not
>  sure if there is additional stuff above and beyond that is
>  docker-specific.)
>
>  -Robyn 
Now that I'm home and can poke around I'm noticing a few things:

1. Correct me if I'm wrong but the only test case on

   
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC2_Cloud?rd=T...

    for the Fedora Docker base image is that you can download the
tarball! There's no indication of what to do with it.

2. The "Add, Modify or Remove a Test Case" paragraph states: "Please
request review for your changes by publishing your test case for
review to the test mailing list and/or the appropriate working group
mailing list (e.g. server, cloud, or desktop). "

So here's my proposed test scenario:

1. Setup
    a. You will need a 64-bit Fedora 21 Workstation with the docker-io
and fedora-dockerfiles packages installed.
    b. You will need a few gigabytes free in /var for the images
you'll be creating.

2. Until the base is on Docker Hub, you'll need to build images from
the tarball. Download the image tarball and checksum file from
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Docker/x86_64/.
At the command line type

    sha256sum -c Fedora-Docker-x86_64-22_Beta_TC2-CHECKSUM

3. Now make sure the Docker service is started. If you want it to
survive reboots enable it as well. Then type

    sudo docker load -i <tarball name>
    sudo docker images

    You should see an image.

4. Now type

    sudo docker run -it <image name> /bin/bash

    You should be logged into the container as "root".

So far I've completed steps 1 - 3 tonight. Step 4 is failing. I'll
post to the Trac ticket once I figure out what's happening.

5. There's a Trac ticket for testing the fedora-dockerfiles at
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/84 so I'll defer to that.
fedora-dockerfiles is also in Bugzilla so once the yum-to-dnf updates
are done I'll be testing those with F22.

> > We'll get Koji fixed to do something more useful by default.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 
OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-jou...

Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:24 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
<znmeb(a)znmeb.net&gt; wrote:

[snip]

>  4. Now type
>
>      sudo docker run -it <image name> /bin/bash
>
>      You should be logged into the container as "root".
>
>  So far I've completed steps 1 - 3 tonight. Step 4 is failing. I'll
>  post to the Trac ticket once I figure out what's happening. 
Good news! Step 4 works now! I don't know what happened earlier but it
gave me a shell prompt.

More good news - my main use case
(https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/znmeb/osjourno-rd/) builds
successfully on the F22 Docker base and passes the ludicrously small
test suite I have at the moment. So I can move on to
fedora-dockerfiles.

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

Thanks!! I'll be on this about 22:00 PDT! ;-)

P.S.: You shouldn't need upload automation. Just set up a Github or
Bitbucket repo with the README and Dockerfile and tarball, then create
an autobuild repository on Docker Hub. Whenever the git repo changes,
Docker Hub will rebuild the image.

I'll put up a sample on the znmeb account at Docker Hub once I get
something working.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Colin Walters <walters(a)verbum.org&gt; wrote:
>  On Mon, Mar 16, 2015, at 03:03 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> > Are there test scenarios somewhere? I can't figure out how to get a
> > working image from the Docker tarball.
>
>  We don't have automation for upload to the Hub AFAIK, and no do we have a
> distribution-specific registry (though I think we should).
>
>  (A few minutes pass)
>
>  Ok, so things here are...suboptimal.  Here's a script you can use:
>
>  https://github.com/cgwalters/fedora-docker-image-import
>
>  We'll get Koji fixed to do something more useful by default.
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 
OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-jou...

Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Monday, March 16, 2015 12:03:26 PM M. Edward  Borasky wrote:
>  Are there test scenarios somewhere? I can't figure out how to get
> a
>  working image from the Docker tarball. 
"docker load  -i <image>" works for me to load the tarball

Dennis

>  On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Joe Brockmeier
> <jzb(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  > Hey all,
>  > 
>  > Some testables for y'all:
>  > 
>  > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Cloud-Images/x86_64
>  > /Images/
>  > 
>  > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Docker/x86_64/
>  > 
>  > If you have time and inclination, testing would not go amiss.
>  > 
>  > Best,
>  > 
>  > jzb
>  > --
>  > Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
>  > jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
>  > Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>  > 
>  > 
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > cloud mailing list
>  > cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Kushal Das]

On 16/03/15, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>  Hey all,
>  
>  Some testables for y'all:
>  
>  https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Cloud-Images/x86_6...
>  
>  https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC2/Docker/x86_64/
>  
>  If you have time and inclination, testing would not go amiss.
>   
Anyone knows why the standard cloud images are missing from the above
mentioned location? I can only see Atomic and Vagrant images.

Kushal
-- 
Fedora Cloud Engineer
CPython Core Developer
Director @ Python Software Foundation
http://kushaldas.in

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 03/17/2015 04:56 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
>  Anyone knows why the standard cloud images are missing from the
> above
>  mentioned location? I can only see Atomic and Vagrant images. 
Hrm. That's a good question. We should also have Vagrant boxes for the
standard Cloud image.

Any volunteers to chase this down?
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:26:45 AM Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>  On 03/17/2015 04:56 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
>  > Anyone knows why the standard cloud images are missing from the above
>  > mentioned location? I can only see Atomic and Vagrant images. 
Cloud base
failed to install, seems its fixed in the last nightlies.

>  Hrm. That's a good question. We should also have Vagrant boxes
> for the
>  standard Cloud image. 
There is no such proposed image and it is too late to go
adding for Fedora 22. 
it needs to be added to rawhide  if you want it in Fedora 23

Dennis

>  Any volunteers to chase this down?

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:10:33AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  > Hrm. That's a good question. We should also have Vagrant
> boxes for the
>  > standard Cloud image.
>  There is no such proposed image and it is too late to go adding for Fedora 22. 
>  it needs to be added to rawhide  if you want it in Fedora 23 
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant_Box_Atomic> is an
accepted change, and includes both "Fedora Atomic Host and Fedora
Cloud flavors". I think this is just an oversight / miscommunication.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 03/18/2015 03:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>  On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:10:33AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> Hrm. That's a good question. We should also have Vagrant boxes for the
> >> standard Cloud image.
> > There is no such proposed image and it is too late to go adding for Fedora 22. 
> > it needs to be added to rawhide  if you want it in Fedora 23
>  
>  <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant_Box_Atomic> is an
>  accepted change, and includes both "Fedora Atomic Host and Fedora
>  Cloud flavors". I think this is just an oversight / miscommunication. 
Oh, good. For a minute, I thought I had imagined that we had asked for
Atomic & Cloud and was going to feel very bad.
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 03:12:12PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>  Oh, good. For a minute, I thought I had imagined that we had asked
> for
>  Atomic & Cloud and was going to feel very bad. 
Still needs someone to create the kickstart file. It looks offhand that
just copying fedora-cloud-atomic-vagrant.ks to
fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks and replacing "%include
fedora-cloud-atomic.ks" with "%include fedora-cloud-base.ks" _may_ be
all that's needed there. In fact, I'll go ahead and do that now.



-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 03:40:07PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>  > Oh, good. For a minute, I thought I had imagined that we had
> asked for
>  > Atomic & Cloud and was going to feel very bad.
>  Still needs someone to create the kickstart file. It looks offhand that
>  just copying fedora-cloud-atomic-vagrant.ks to
>  fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks and replacing "%include
>  fedora-cloud-atomic.ks" with "%include fedora-cloud-base.ks" _may_ be
>  all that's needed there. In fact, I'll go ahead and do that now. 
But someone who is a feature owner should check that it actually
works, make any necessary changes, and sync with releng so it starts
getting built as part of the test candidates!

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

Is there going to be a new Atomic image soon? I've done pretty much
all I can with TC2 - I got everything working except Cockpit, which
doesn't seem to be in the image.

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 03:40:07PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > Oh, good. For a minute, I thought I had imagined that we had asked for
> > > Atomic & Cloud and was going to feel very bad.
> > Still needs someone to create the kickstart file. It looks offhand that
> > just copying fedora-cloud-atomic-vagrant.ks to
> > fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks and replacing "%include
> > fedora-cloud-atomic.ks" with "%include fedora-cloud-base.ks" _may_ be
> > all that's needed there. In fact, I'll go ahead and do that now.
>
>  But someone who is a feature owner should check that it actually
>  works, make any necessary changes, and sync with releng so it starts
>  getting built as part of the test candidates!
>
>  --
>  Matthew Miller
>  <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  Fedora Project Leader
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 
OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-jou...

Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.

[David Gay]

----- Original Message -----
>  From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(a)znmeb.net&gt;
>  To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:25:18 PM
>  Subject: Re: Testables for beta TC2
>  
>  Is there going to be a new Atomic image soon? I've done pretty much
>  all I can with TC2 - I got everything working except Cockpit, which
>  doesn't seem to be in the image. 
Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but there are Atomic and Vagrant images
for TC5 that have been out for a few days:

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC5/Cloud-Images/x86_64...

-- David

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

Yeah - that's what I'm looking for. I must have missed an announcement.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:42 PM, David Gay <dgay(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(a)znmeb.net&gt;
> > To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:25:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: Testables for beta TC2
> >
> > Is there going to be a new Atomic image soon? I've done pretty much
> > all I can with TC2 - I got everything working except Cockpit, which
> > doesn't seem to be in the image.
>
>  Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but there are Atomic and Vagrant images
> for TC5 that have been out for a few days:
>
>  http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC5/Cloud-Images/x86_64...
>
>  -- David
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 
OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-jou...

Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.

[David Gay]

----- Original Message -----
>  From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(a)znmeb.net&gt;
>  To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:31:28 PM
>  Subject: Re: Testables for beta TC2
>  
>  Yeah - that's what I'm looking for. I must have missed an announcement.
>  
>  On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:42 PM, David Gay <dgay(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  > ----- Original Message -----
>  >> From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(a)znmeb.net&gt;
>  >> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:25:18 PM
>  >> Subject: Re: Testables for beta TC2
>  >>
>  >> Is there going to be a new Atomic image soon? I've done pretty much
>  >> all I can with TC2 - I got everything working except Cockpit, which
>  >> doesn't seem to be in the image.
>  >
>  > Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but there are Atomic and
>  > Vagrant images for TC5 that have been out for a few days:
>  >
>  > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC5/Cloud-Images/x86_64...
>  >
>  > -- David
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > cloud mailing list
>  > cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>  
>  
>  
>  --
>  OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
>  http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-jou...
>  
>  Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.
>  _______________________________________________
>  cloud mailing list
>  cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>   
Yeah, it was announced on rel-eng list. Enjoy! :)

-- David