Fedora Package review request - Multiple Rubygems - prerequisites for OpenNebula 3.x support in Fedora Cloud

[Shawn Starr]

Hello everyone, 

I dont usually like to cross post to multiple DLs but since These are Ruby 
specific the Ruby SIG folks want to make sure the packages are following their 
standards.

In order to get the pre-prerequisites needed for OpenNebula support in Fedora 
Cloud, I would like some help in package reviews if you can spare some cycles.

Could the Ruby SIG and or Cloud SIG please review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051
(Review Request: rubygem-stringex - Extensions to Rubys String class)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 
(Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179 
(Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428
(Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling)

3rd party packaging, they need a sponsor:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 
(Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML 
parsing library)

Once these are all approved, I will begin submitting rubygems for: 

Rubygem Datamapper and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-dm-*)
Rubygem Dataobjects and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-do-*)

Then finally OpenNebula 3.0 itself.

Thanks for your help,
Shawn.

[Shawn Starr]

On Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:57:20 AM Shawn Starr wrote:
>  Hello everyone,
>  
>  I dont usually like to cross post to multiple DLs but since These are Ruby
>  specific the Ruby SIG folks want to make sure the packages are following
>  their standards.
>  
>  In order to get the pre-prerequisites needed for OpenNebula support in
>  Fedora Cloud, I would like some help in package reviews if you can spare
>  some cycles.
>   
Is there any chance someone can please review these? 

>  Could the Ruby SIG and or Cloud SIG please review:
>  
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051
>  (Review Request: rubygem-stringex - Extensions to Rubys String class)
>  
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088
>  (Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library)
>  
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179
>  (Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb)
>  
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428
>  (Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling)
>  
>  3rd party packaging, they need a sponsor:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854
>  (Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML
>  parsing library)
>  
>  Once these are all approved, I will begin submitting rubygems for:
>  
>  Rubygem Datamapper and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-dm-*)
>  Rubygem Dataobjects and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-do-*)
>  
>  Then finally OpenNebula 3.0 itself.
>  
>  Thanks for your help,
>  Shawn.

[Steve Traylen]

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Shawn Starr <shawn.starr(a)rogers.com&gt; wrote:
> > 3rd party packaging, they need a sponsor:
>
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854
>
> > (Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat
> > XML
>
> > parsing library) 
They have a sponser me but I need to see more that just one package, some
informal reviews of other packages before I can approve.

-- 
Steve Traylen

[Shawn Starr]

On Friday, August 12, 2011 10:48:14 AM Steve Traylen wrote:
>  On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Shawn Starr
> <shawn.starr(a)rogers.com&gt; wrote:
>  >> 3rd party packaging, they need a sponsor:
>  >> 
>  >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854
>  >> 
>  >> (Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the
>  >> Expat
>  >> XML
>  >> 
>  >> parsing library)
>  
>  They have a sponser me but I need to see more that just one package, some
>  informal reviews of other packages before I can approve. 
Hi Steve, that's for xmlparser, but I need help on the ones I've packaged also 
:)

I have provenpackager so I just need formal reviews then I'll kick off builds 
in rawhide once approved.

[Mo Morsi]

>  Is there any chance someone can please review these?
>
>  
Unfortunately don't have the cycles myself but since you're a proven 
packager, I'd just ask on fedora-devel, or just watch that as there are 
package swap requests that come through all the time. Most likely you 
can swap a few requests at the very least very quickly.

   -Mo