Please test git-review RPM

[Pete Zaitcev]

Dear All:

I am thinking about packaging git-review (the real one, not Facebook's),
and to that end I prepared RPMs that are to be submitted for Fedora.
Before I do that, I'd like someone verify that they work.

AFAIK both Gluster and OpenStack use Gerrit with git-review. These RPMs
come from OpenStack source, and I am very curious if they are compatible
with Gluster use, so that we can have one in Fedora.

http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm

Thanks and have a happy New Year,
-- Pete

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:15:46AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>  Dear All:
>  
>  I am thinking about packaging git-review (the real one, not Facebook's),
>  and to that end I prepared RPMs that are to be submitted for Fedora.
>  Before I do that, I'd like someone verify that they work.
>  
>  AFAIK both Gluster and OpenStack use Gerrit with git-review. These RPMs
>  come from OpenStack source, and I am very curious if they are compatible
>  with Gluster use, so that we can have one in Fedora.
>  
>  http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
>  http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm 
These URIs are both 404's for me. Do you have a newer n-e-v-r
available to test?

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

[Pádraig Brady]

On 01/05/2012 03:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>  On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:15:46AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Dear All:
> >
> > I am thinking about packaging git-review (the real one, not Facebook's),
> > and to that end I prepared RPMs that are to be submitted for Fedora.
> > Before I do that, I'd like someone verify that they work.
> >
> > AFAIK both Gluster and OpenStack use Gerrit with git-review. These RPMs
> > come from OpenStack source, and I am very curious if they are compatible
> > with Gluster use, so that we can have one in Fedora.
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
> > http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm
>  
>  These URIs are both 404's for me. Do you have a newer n-e-v-r
>  available to test? 
http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.9-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.9-1.fc16.src.rpm

cheers,
Pádraig.

[Pete Zaitcev]

On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:56:55 +0000
Pádraig Brady <P(a)draigBrady.com&gt; wrote:

>  >>
> http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
>  >> http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm
>  > 
>  > These URIs are both 404's for me. Do you have a newer n-e-v-r
>  > available to test?
>  
>  http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.9-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
>  http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.9-1.fc16.src.rpm 
Indeed; thanks, Pádraig. I also stash older ones here, in case there's
a need to refer to them:
 http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/

I have a related question: do we want to disable the update nag?
I do not mind it as such, but every run of git-review pokes
pypi.python.org, even those that otherwise could work offline.

-- Pete

[Pádraig Brady]

On 01/05/2012 08:52 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>  On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:56:55 +0000
>  Pádraig Brady <P(a)draigBrady.com&gt; wrote:
>  
> >>> http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
> >>> http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm
> >>
> >> These URIs are both 404's for me. Do you have a newer n-e-v-r
> >> available to test?
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.9-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
> > http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.9-1.fc16.src.rpm
>  
>  Indeed; thanks, Pádraig. I also stash older ones here, in case there's
>  a need to refer to them:
>   http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/
>  
>  I have a related question: do we want to disable the update nag?
>  I do not mind it as such, but every run of git-review pokes
>  pypi.python.org, even those that otherwise could work offline. 
For packaged software I would definitely avoid pinging upstream

cheers,
Pádraig.