On 9/1/2011 8:20 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 06:33:25PM -0400, Robert Knight wrote:
> As I have reported in the Wiki, there are troubles with the SysV init
> scripts on Fedora 15. The defect is caused by the change in F15 to a
> tmpfs for /var/run. Thus, the target directory for the pid's does not
> survive a reboot. So, some way is needed to (re-)create /var/run/glance
> and /var/run/nova or the startup scripts need to be changed to just put
> the pid's directly into /var/run, which will be there. Does anyone know
> whether there is a standard resolution to this?
Can't the init scripts just "mkdir -p /var/run/nova" before starting the
binary?
That was indeed the solution I adopted. What I was asking was whether
there was a conventional solution -- almost all of the other packages
that are already present do not build their own subdirectories in /var/run.
> The Short-Description and Description fields in the SysV init
script for
> openstack-glance-registry (as well as the other comments) is incorrect.
>
> The systemd packaging guidelines say that the systemd unit files should
> be sent back upstream. Does anyone know whether upstream would accept this?
I converted the init scripts to systemd units in f16, I haven't
submitted these upstream as they don't seem to have any init scripts
in their repo's (other than for xenserver).
I'm glad to hear it. In which
src.rpm are they?
-Angus
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Regards,
Robert