On 08/16/2018 08:33 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 12:52:47 -0400, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> I like the idea of a meta-science SIG that could help each other. I suspect
> that many of these have small memberships.
> What do folks think? Would this come under CommOps?
> I think CommOps may be able to help, but isn't where this should live. If we
> need a body for this to have a dotted line too, I suggest Mindshare. See
> Globalization here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/orgchart/
Ah---yeh, that seems like a good way to go. I'll get in touch with
Mindshare and see what we can do.
I think a regularly-meeting group of related SIGs is a helpful idea. I
think this is a good example of a task for CommOps to assist with. I
have never known a formal process to declare a SIG (also how some
fluctuate in activity over time, e.g. Games SIG). So I am not sure if we
should block this on a process if the process is not intentionally adopted.
My suggestion is to open a new CommOps ticket similar to our past
tickets for helping other teams get started, such as Modularity¹, Python
SIG², and DotNet SIG³.
I'd like to discuss it further and see how we can help!
Justin W. Flory