[fedora-commops] Issue #95 `[Onboarding Series] DotNet SIG`

[Pagure]

rhea reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-commops` that you are following:
``
This issue is a stub for working out ideas, concepts, and other steps involved for
contributors who would like to officially join the DotNet team.

## Problem
The goal of the dotnet SIG is to establish dotnet presence in Fedora, from providing
information to the user, through taking care of dotnet packages in future Fedora releases,
to providing information and help to other packagers.

## Current state
Basic [wiki page[1]](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DotNet) was drafted, [mailing
list[3]](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/dotnet-sig.lists.fed...
and [FAS group[4]](https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/dotnet-sig)
created, and we are currently looking for a good
[time](http://whenisgood.net/fedora-dotnet) for IRC
[meetings](https://pagure.io/fedora-dotnet/issue/1). During the first IRC meeting we
should discuss the future goals and next steps of our progress
([agenda](https://pagure.io/fedora-dotnet/issue/2))

## Questions & Ideas
* **Wiki page** - Everything is currently at
[wiki/dotnet[1]](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DotNet) while I would like _this_ page to
contain general info about dotnet on Fedora, info for the user and packagers how to use
dotnet, etc... and to move the organizational part about the team and joining it to
[wiki/SIGs/dotnet[2]](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/DotNet)
* **FAS Group & Mailing List** - I'm not entirely sure about this, what would it
ideally look like in the future, however for now there is no reason to do anything and we
can keep it as it is with a single group and list. The idea for the future is, that if
dotnet becomes popular and the group would grow, we should split off the core team and
create new fas group and mailing list `dotnet-devel` or something along those lines, while
the SIG would remain generic and public group of people with common interest.
* **What next?** (technical side) - This should be answered during the first (above
mentioned) IRC meeting, it should go along the lines of getting all the current problems
together (pagure issues) and starting to look into them one by one - we should come up
with priorities, etc... Next steps in organization of the group are already outlined and
questions are raised in the above points.

### ref

1. wiki/dotnet: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DotNet
2. wiki/SIGs/dotnet: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/DotNet
3. mailing list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/dotnet-sig.lists.fedoraprojec...
4. FAS group: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/dotnet-sig
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/95

[Pagure]

rhea added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Meeting minutes from our first meeting where we discussed both, organization, and how to
proceed...

https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-11-04/dotnet.2016-1...
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/95

[Pagure]

jflory7 added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
**Discussed in [2017-01-24
meeting](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-01-24/comm...

@rhea shared questions about confusion over some of the situations the DotNet SIG is
facing with regards to packaging. Radka is going to reach out to some other
language-specific SIGs or others for advice on how to proceed.

However, the key feedback is that it is difficult to learn more about pkgdb and how new
teams should proceed. This could make a good topic as a separate issue as well.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/95

[Justin W. Flory]

jflory7 added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I had followed up with @rhea in IRC and we agreed that this ticket was complete. Going to
go ahead and close it out! :clapper: 

Happy to see the DotNet SIG running at full speed. :smile: 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/95

[Justin W. Flory]

The status of the issue: `[Onboarding Series] DotNet SIG` of project: `fedora-commops` has
been updated to: Closed as Complete by jflory7.

https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/95