On 02/21/2017 04:48 PM, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Amita wrote:
> On 02/20/2017 09:48 PM, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Amita wrote:
>>> I have these blogs in pending state (review and publish).
>>> Please help me to publish them -
>>> 1. University Connect - D. Y. Patil College, Pune
>>> 2. University Connect – PCCOE , Pune
>>> 3. Fedora Diversity Team - 2 years and Running
>> I haven't noticed traffic in the Diversity ML or meetings about this
>> post. I believe we should make sure that the team is signed off on this
>> before it is published.
> Sure, I have sent mail on list now and will include this in meeting
> agenda as well.
As a team, commops needs to make sure that posts like this are vetted
with the appropriate subteams. I am not trying to make this case that
this happens a lot or has even happened before, but the editing must
include this check. We do not want commops to be perceived as either
the controler of all news (meaning no contributions from others) or as
the decider of all things (we let someone publish something about a team
solely because they thought it was a good idea and now it is "official"
because it was on a Fedora property). This is why I flagged this.
that and appreciate the idea of better collaboration.
That's why a quick action taken.
>> Also, I think we should push that team to publish their FAD report
>> before publishing this retrospective/forward piece.
> yes, that is coordinated with Justin and that is the plan to push this
> post after 1-2 weeks of FAD report post.
What is the goal of this piece? Why would we want to push two huge
Diversity pieces out so close together?
Goal is to make more awareness about
We can publish this one later after some time gap (time gap can be
discussed in meeting).
Thanks & Regards,
Fedora Community Operations (CommOps) mailing list -- commops(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to commops-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org