https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431546
Tomas Orsava torsava@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(torsava@redhat.co | |m) |
--- Comment #7 from Tomas Orsava torsava@redhat.com --- (In reply to Honza Horak from comment #6)
Actually I've realized we should probably keep the version in the name, similar as it is done for the module names, so we should eventually have python2 and python3 containers. I've changed the subject to reflect this.
Tomas, does it make sense to you this way?
Indeed it does!
Food for thought: It might even be beneficial to go one step further and name it `python35`. Python minor versions (3.5 v 3.6) are not API/ABI compatible and thus instead of updating the container from python 3.5 to 3.6 it might make more sense to release a new `python36` container. However, the maintenance burden would of course be increased.
container-review@lists.fedoraproject.org