https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859387
Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |clems.verna(a)gmail.com
Flags| |needinfo?(clems.verna@gmail
| |.com)
--- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com> ---
By "packaging files", I mean using the files being copied into the image in the
Dockerfile in lines 61 and 64. If so, I believe the files should be linked here
for the Review (let me know if you'd like me to go through that repository
instead).
As for the image name, I believe the $FGC has been dropped from the guidelines,
where we should now use just the main component name in the package. Moreover,
shouldn't this bug name be the same as the image name and component, i.e., php?
Then you could manipulate the image tag depending on the base image used to
point to the proper php version you want to ship. Otherwise, we'd have to
package/review this image multiple times for different Fedora releases.
Thoughts?
I am also pinging Clement here to hear his ideas on this one :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.