On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:58:00 PM CET Michal Novotny wrote:
Hello, I will deploy fedmsg hotfix tomorrow at 7:30am UTC. I am very
sorry
for the inconvenience.
I'm very sorry too. I failed with testing this against fedmsg because I was
even unable to connect to fedmsg. And I did not realize that this could get to
production so quickly, I was kind of believed staging environment.
I'd like to propose follow-up patch for Michal's hot-fix; to unify the
code so only one announce_job() (in super-class) is available.
I probably see reason why the announce_job() was added to FedMsg
sub-class, but we can still pretty easily fix the general "API" and fix
Red Hat's copr so it accepts different format of message (without touching
FedMsg's api anymore) ... rather than have two announce_job() implementations.
I'm just curious what happened with '{who}' part of the message?
But, ugh, I'm bit afraid of fixing the code now without being able to test
properly ... could I get a testing access to fedmsg so I can avoid similar
issues in future?
Thanks,
Pavel