On 03/17/2014 01:54 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
The use of COPR, copr, Copr is a bit inconsistent, I tried to use
Copr when
referring to the build system and copr for repos. And there's the question
of whether it's supposed to be coprs, or copr repositories, or...?
*nod* The term Copr was overloaded. For last few months I'm trying to use Copr only
for
project itself. And for copr (in meaning of repository/project) I'm using term
"project".
E.g. "The copr repo to build the package in." I would rephrase now as "The
project to build the package in."
I applied yours commit, because it is definitely better then current situation. But feel
free to send another commit
with changes s/copr/project/ where it is appropriate.
Only notable change was to change the API URL to the fedoraproject
one. I
found the previous mention confusing, I tried to use .../whot/project/api,
and ...whot/api before I realised it's just the server name.
Feel free to apply all hunks or just partially, as you prefer.
I tried to be general here, because you can create and deploy your own build system. But I
agree that 99% of people will
use Fedora instance, so using full URL will be less confusing.
Thanks for the contribution.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys