11:17 a.m.
New subject: |Re:Couldweallowissuetrackeringithub?
On Friday, October 7, 2016 5:17:20 PM CEST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Pavel Raiskup
<praiskup(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> SSIA, WDYT?
I'm ++, /me hates all that struggling with RHBZ.
I like bugzilla, but for upstream project I wouldn't bother other source
consumers with doing Red Hat Bugzilla accounts..
While we discuss bugzilla -- it would be fine to have direct link to list
of (all) bugs currently filled against Copr, somewhere. That's imo the
major benefit of github issues for newcommers (no need to search how the
component or project is named .. the list is there).
Thanks, Pavel
2:27 a.m.
New subject: |Re:Couldweallowissuetrackeringithub?
Dne 7.10.2016 v 18:17 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
While we discuss bugzilla -- it would be fine to have direct link to
list
of (all) bugs currently filled against Copr, somewhere. That's imo the
major benefit of github issues for newcommers (no need to search how the
component or project is named .. the list is there).
Great idea. Done.
https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/commit/f55f3a959646d82640fbb7fa613b50...
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
2:32 a.m.
New subject: |Re:Couldweallowissuetrackeringithub?
Dne 7.10.2016 v 17:17 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
I'm ++, /me hates all that struggling with RHBZ.
I'm --, I hate github's issue tracker when it is longer than one page. It is
useful for small project. But for bigger
projects no.
BZ allows us to track which issues were modified, and which are part of which release. We
can change several reports at
once. I am using the reporting charts...
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
2:35 a.m.
New subject: |Re:Couldweallowissuetrackeringithub?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Dne 7.10.2016 v 17:17 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> I'm ++, /me hates all that struggling with RHBZ.
I'm --, I hate github's issue tracker when it is longer than one page. It is
useful for small project. But for bigger
projects no.
Then why for systemd it works fine?
BZ allows us to track which issues were modified, and which are part
of which release. We can change several reports at
once. I am using the reporting charts...
You can use it with github as well. For
example, systemd team does:
https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/blog/how-is-systemd-doing-on-github.html
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
_______________________________________________
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
--
-Igor Gnatenko
2:44 a.m.
New subject: |Re:Couldweallowissuetrackeringithub?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:35:59AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý
<msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Dne 7.10.2016 v 17:17 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
>> I'm ++, /me hates all that struggling with RHBZ.
>
> I'm --, I hate github's issue tracker when it is longer than one page. It is
useful for small project. But for bigger
> projects no.
Then why for systemd it works fine?
Different people different taste?
Pierre
2:47 a.m.
New subject: |Re:Couldweallowissuetrackeringithub?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:35:59AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Dne 7.10.2016 v 17:17 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> >> I'm ++, /me hates all that struggling with RHBZ.
> >
> > I'm --, I hate github's issue tracker when it is longer than one page.
It is useful for small project. But for bigger
> > projects no.
> Then why for systemd it works fine?
Different people different taste?
Comment was about small/big projects.
Pierre
_______________________________________________
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
--
-Igor Gnatenko
2754
days inactive
2757
days old
copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Igor Gnatenko -
Miroslav Suchý -
Pavel Raiskup -
Pierre-Yves Chibon