On 12/04/2012 08:30 AM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Luis Rodriguez wrote at 17:19 (EST) on Monday:
I personally see a benefit to evolve copyleft-next slowly to enhance copyleft where GPLv2 left off,
[...]
I suggest that you take merge request in, which will document my reasons why I think it should be there in the git log. Then, when you remove it again, you can put your reasons why you're removing it into the git log.
I have now made a significant revision to the definition of Corresponding Source:
"Corresponding Source" of a Covered Work in Object Code form means (i) the Source Code of the Covered Work; (ii) all associated interface definition files; (iii) all scripts, instructions and similar information that were used to build such Source Code; and (iv) a list clearly identifying all Separate Works that were used in building and installing the Covered Work. Corresponding Source must be machine-readable.