On 6/12/19 5:30 AM, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I agree about /usr/lib. Moreover, I think /usr/lib has been misused
> quite a lot for configuration files lately. The idea of a
> /usr/sysconfig makes a lot more sense to me. For the first time in a
> while, we're getting a descriptive name for it, and it's easily
> If I could wave a wand, I'd move all of the stuff we'd been putting in
> /usr/lib into /usr/sysconfig. :)
I started a discussion about the directory name on the fhs mailing list:
Thanks! I subscribed to the list, awaiting confirmation.
Please help and comment there, too, so that this discussion will not
end again with "use something below /usr/lib or /usr/share" and no
agreement on one directory.
Others in the FCOS community, can we try to weigh in on the thread Thorsten linked to?