[CoreOS] Re: RFC: Atomic Updates configuration handling proposal by Thorsten Kukuk for CoreOS
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 03, Neal Gompa wrote:
I have one main quibble currently with it: I think
/usr/share/defaults
is not descriptive of what it is _and_ does. I much prefer
/usr/share/sysconfig (though I might be persuaded to
/usr/share/baseconfig or /usr/share/defconfig).
My problem currently is more /usr/share at all. It should only contain
architecture independent data, so that you can share it between all
machines (but I really doubt that anybody is still doing so today).
But there are some configuration files, which are not architecture
independent, not even host independent. E.g. passwd, shadow, ...
But the feedback was also, that /usr/lib is already overcrowded and
chaotic and nobody finds there anything anymore...
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & MicroOS
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)