On Mar 19, 2015 6:04 PM, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:37:12AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Miller
> > <mattdm@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:49:29AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > >> > To be honest, I would delete it entirely.
> > >> As one of that page's original authors, I agree.  The WGs and other
> > >> events have overtaken this page.
> > >
> > > I don't have a problem with that, but note that it is linked to by
> > > about 80 other pages on the wiki. I'm about half serious about
> > > suggesting that we should start anew with a clean slate. (More
> > > precisely, a new wiki for documnetation only, with clear separation
> > > between user documentation and internal-facing documentation, and
> > > between drafts and final documents. Leave the existing wiki as an
> > > anything-goes workspace.)
> >
> > The solution to stale wikis is not to create more wikis...
>
> It's also not to use a wiki to set the future direction for
> documentation. :-)
>

Is this a problem for docs (or a collaboration between docs and marketing)? Why does the council have anything to do with the IA[1] of fedora's communication for documentation , org, getting started, etc? I could see "approval" or "objective identification" but not "solution". I would posit that the people in those groups are way more competent in the subject than I am.

Langdon

[1]: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_architecture

> --
> Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
>   gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
>   http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
>     The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
> _______________________________________________
> council-discuss mailing list
> council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss