On 02/07/2017 03:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:30:14AM +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> - Marketing + Magazine
> - Ambassadors
> - CommOps
> - Diversity
> - Join
> - Modularity
> - FESCo
> - Docs
Good list (also thanks Robert for additional comments). I think I'd
split out Magazine and Marketing entirely into two things, at this
point — this will probably highlight that Marketing without Magazine
needs a lot of help, but that's not a wrong thing to highlight.
Hi! Just to add some of my thoughts here, I would strongly be +1 to
separating Marketing and Magazine too. Since the Magazine has grown
since its start, it has become more of its own sub-project independent
from Marketing, and there isn't much overlap between members.
>> Oh, and also I will be on vacation Feb 22. :)
> If we have this meeting, Modularity seems to be a great fit as it is
> probably an area you (mattdm) are already caught up with.
Petr did a report on Base Runtime back in October, which I guess is
getting to be a long time ago now. And Langdon did an update almost
exactly a year ago. I guess it's probably time to do this in light of
Modularity as an Objective — we are at the end of the timeframe put
forth in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization,_Prototyp...
so it's time to update/renew — or, I guess, move on, if it's at a point
where it's complete or no longer needs high-level attention... which
I'm not sure is the case :).
Another question to clarify – is the plan to only have one report per
meeting? I've pitched this idea for Marketing and we are discussing it
now during the Diversity meeting, but I also know CommOps and the
Magazine would probably be interested in giving a report. I'm not sure
if there is a priority list for some groups, but it would be helpful to
know if there will only be these three meetings with one report per
subgroup, or if there will be room for more.
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflory7(a)gmail.com