On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Robert Mayr <robyduck(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
2015-11-19 14:52 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org>:
[snip]
>
> But all of this aside, FOSCo needs to happen extremely soon or it
> needs to go back to the drawing board. It's planned existence without
> actual existence is causing confusion and actually causing more
> problems.
>
> josh
> _______________________________________________
>
Josh, as always you get the point :)
The main problem is:
* Actual FAmSCo members are serving the commitee since June 2013, and
although you're saying the interim activity is ongoing well, that's
unfortunately not happening (and I feel responsible for that)
* FOSCo elections would be much better, but it's a body which should have
started a year ago. Do you have a plan to make FOSCo happen within the next
weeks? If yes I'd say YAY!!! Probably nobody can say for sure when we are
able to put FOSCo in place, define exact responsibilities, involve all the
teams and write correct Wiki pages and election terms for it.
I would think the person most able to answer such questions is Remy.
You are correct though, I don't believe anyone can answer them today.
And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo member I'm
strongly
suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes, let's add to
the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have to play an
*active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with the Council
or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks.
Does this sound more reasonable for you?
Sounds fantastic to me!
josh