On Wed, Jun 7, 2017, at 03:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:42:55AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> I would prefer the Pagure instead of
getfedora.org as Pagure aims to
>> the same purpose as GitHub does.
>>
getfedora.org is more a hub to download already done stuff, where
>> Pagure as well as GitHub is a collaborative space holding source
>> codes/repositories.
>
> True. My concern is that pagure.io isn't _just_ Fedora stuff or
> official Fedora Project, and the front page is a little intimidating
> and confusing.
If we had all the Fedora stuff namespaced under a Fedora organization
in pagure.io, it might be easier.
This would definitely work, however it creates an extra layer. I think
a key challenge with Pagure today is that as Matthew pointed out, the
front page is very intimidating. I also find the search to be very
non-intuitive. The displays of repos i'm in/watching/etc. is also
sorted in a way that isn't obvious to me and I find that private forks
sometimes rank higher than their upstreams.
I wonder if we could find people interested in cleaning up the interface
a bit more as I know that Pingou and team are busy. I also wonder if
fedora.pagure.io or pagure.fp.o wouldn't be a better home for Fedora
specific stuff.
regards,
bex