#40: Enforcing the code of conduct
----------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: duffy | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: Legal | Resolution:
Keywords: coc, code of conduct |
----------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by robyduck):
My thought here is to define, enforcing the CoC, clearly what happens for
anti-social behavior etc., but we cannot let it up to event owners to
decide beyond the single event.
So Rex's proposal to just drop the "(and future Fedora events)" sounds
reasonable to me, because the event owner should be able to deny access to
"his" event, but not to future events.[[br]]
Probably we could add another sentence that in case of violation of CoC,
regardless of what the owner of an event decided, the Council will discuss
further actions if justified. This can go from denial of travel aid to
time-based rejection of registration/speaker proposals or anything else.
What I don't like to see in an open community, as Fedora, is to have too
many rules and judges for everything. People should be able to know how to
behave, but this is valid also the other way around. All contributors and
owners, which have very different cultures and feelings about what exactly
could be against the CoC, should behave accepting and eventually
discussing any opinion without the need to go beyond the red line of our
CoC.
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/40#comment:8>
council <
https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets