On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 20:14, Ben Cotton <bcotton@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:12 PM Justin W. Flory <foss@jwf.io> wrote:
> Please share the link to the upstream ticket once you file. I'll
> subscribe too to stay in the loop.

So, we talked about this with Ben, and I realised I lied about Antora caring about the branch name. It only cares about the "version" field in the antora.yml (the config in all repos, like [0]). I went ahead and tested it, it worked, so I wanted to report results here, but I see the ticket above already has this as an answer.

So as a step 1, we can move repos to the "main" branch, and the only thing we need to change is the main site.yml [1]. We need to add a branch explicitly to those repos. This solves the git branches.

And as step 2, when they implement the empty version (see the ticket above), we can also change the individual antora.yml files in all repos to get rid of the word "master" on the site.

[0] https://pagure.io/fedora-magazine/blob/master/f/antora.yml#_9
[1] https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/blob/prod/f/site.yml

Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org


Adam Šamalík
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat