#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy
-------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: pfrields | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Resolution:
Keywords: workstation |
-------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
Replying to [comment:14 rhughes]:
Could someone (mattdm?) test the gnome-software in rawhide (3.21.4)
and
tell me if what I've implemented is "good enough" for this
ticket? In the
case where the .repo file is installed but not enabled we still show the
dialog to enable the nonfree source just before starting the install
action. Thanks.
So, I installed that and dropped in Google's chrome repo file, but I don't
see Chrome showing up in search -- do you have a test-case?
I see various software has "third-party" tags, which is weird, because
this system has no non-Fedora software. It's labeled Midori as third-
party, for example. That seems more like a bug than a policy problem. I
don't see any way to as a user to filter by tags, though.
I know we're way into the implementation details that Alan wants me to
stay away from, but the blue boxes with information describing what the
tags mean seem fine to me in placement (although the text could use
expansion), at least for within the display of individual applications.
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:20>
council <
https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets