Il 25/apr/2016 04:14 PM, "Christoph Wickert" <christoph.wickert@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'll be on a train in the middle of nowhere tonight, so I won't be
> able to make it to the council meeting.
>
> Regarding the budget: For me, fF/hDI scenario sounds best, but frankly
> speaking I'm not happy with it either. It's not that I don't like the
> scenario, but the overall process. It's hard to vote on abstract
> scenarios without knowing what they actually mean for the people. We
> want to support some outreachy stuff, but do we actually have ideas
> how to spend 5k? What events do we attend? Who will attend these
> events?
>
> Ultimately, we want Fedora to be a flat hierarchy. Decisions-making
> should happen bottom-up and on the lowest possible level. Scenarios on
> the other hand seem very top-down.
>
> FAmSCo has been working hard to delegate as much responsibility down
> to the regions. This process has been working well and inspired people
> to participate. Therefor I suggest we first look at what they request,
> make some adjustments and once we know how much we need for regional
> support, we know how much is left for FADs and Outreachy.
>
> Best regards,
> Christoph
> _______________________________________________
> council-discuss mailing list
> council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
> open source software and content as a collaborative community.

Apologies for my absence today, I've not even been able to send regrets in time. It's holiday here and I returned back home really late, sorry.
Robert