#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy
-------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: pfrields | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Resolution:
Keywords: workstation |
-------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
Replying to [comment:10 pfrields]:
I think part 2 wording is confusing, for instance using
"hide" where
either you may not mean hide, or you specifically said you
don't want to
dictate implementation. I understand what you mean but the language is
confusing.
Just re-read and I'm not sure how to rephrase. Suggestions? I definitely
_did_ mean "hide", and I don't think that's high level enough that I
don't
consider it an implementation detail. (_How_ they're hidden — now that is
implementation.)
Again, this is why I feel like the labeling effectively solves the
problem already. Perhaps "delineate" would be better here, but I
understand you may not feel labeling is *enough* delineation. I would
encourage some better language here, though, and that if you don't want to
dictate implementation, don't. :-)
Do you have a suggestion for alternate wording? I know you're not on the
council, but anyone is free to help. :)
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:11>
council <
https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets