On 16 April 2015 at 17:03, Matthew Miller <mattdm@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:52:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > After a short while, it was determined that anything wordpress
> > related was better run at an opensource friendly company which
> > specialized in blogging software versus running it ourselves. If a
[...]
> Right, as smooge says there was once a wordpress-mu setup in
> infrastructure. However, people really didn't use it much at all and it
> was a pain to keep going with security updates, plugins, etc, etc.
> So, we retired it and suggested people should move to wordpress.com as
> they were open source and friendly and did this for a living.

This makes sense to me, but contradicts what Paul said. :)

Can we do everything we're doing on fedoramagazine.org that way? Not
that we _have_ to do them both the same, but it kind of makes sense to
consolidate.



So infrastructure does not run that in any shape or form. We have no access to it and it was setup and is administered by other people. All we do is forward http/https through our proxies to the openshift servers it is on. If that is what you would like, we can do the proxy to whatever someone sets up in openshift. 


 

> Perhaps we should gather stakeholders and see what makes more sense
> moving forward? Perhaps we could approach wordpress.com and ask them
> for some N sites? Or if people are really using them and we have a
> strong group of maintainers we could look at hosting them in
> infrastructure again.

Yeah that seems like a good approach.


> Or I suppose we could just leave it with everyone
> hosting their own stuff in openshift.

We do happen to know some openshift experts around. :)

--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss



--
Stephen J Smoogen.