On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:52:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > After a short while, it was determined that anything wordpress
> > related was better run at an opensource friendly company which
> > specialized in blogging software versus running it ourselves. If a
[...]
> Right, as smooge says there was once a wordpress-mu setup in
> infrastructure. However, people really didn't use it much at all and it
> was a pain to keep going with security updates, plugins, etc, etc.
> So, we retired it and suggested people should move to wordpress.com as
> they were open source and friendly and did this for a living.
This makes sense to me, but contradicts what Paul said. :)
Can we do everything we're doing on fedoramagazine.org that way? Not
that we _have_ to do them both the same, but it kind of makes sense to
consolidate.
> Perhaps we should gather stakeholders and see what makes more sense
> moving forward? Perhaps we could approach wordpress.com and ask them
> for some N sites? Or if people are really using them and we have a
> strong group of maintainers we could look at hosting them in
> infrastructure again.
Yeah that seems like a good approach.
> Or I suppose we could just leave it with everyone
> hosting their own stuff in openshift.
We do happen to know some openshift experts around. :)
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss