On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 18:59 +0100, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Dne 26.11.2009 18:21, Denys Vlasenko napsal(a):
They are:
/usr/bin/abrt-pyhook-helper /usr/libexec/hookCCpp
Both names and paths are different.
I propose using abrt-xxx scheme for every binary's name (btw, maybe for dumpoops too?). That will fix one discrepancy - in the name.
Definitely yes. I'm loudly thinking about abrt-cpp-hook and abrt-dumpsoops.
Does it make sense to move abrt-pyhook-helper to /usr/libexec?
I don't get it why /usr/libexec exist.
Perhaps the idea is that you put stuff there which you don't want to be accessible through $PATH, so it has less chance to be accidentally run.
Usually stuff which is meant to be never run from command line and such. -- vda