Máirín Duffy (duffy(a)fedoraproject.org) said:
On 04/04/2013 10:33 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> ... especially since packagers aren't allowed to ship their own versions
> of any logos.
My team and I are more than happy to discuss any new or modified usages
of the logo and produce appropriate artwork, getting it added to the
fedora-logos package as necessary, for any packager who has the need and
comes to us.
I understand your desire to have input into how the logo is used. My point
is that if the logos provided *as the only logos that software in Fedora
can use* aren't suitable to use as is, it amounts to merely playing
with people who are trying to use the right thing that the design team
has already provided them.
If fedora-logos doesn't provide an actual version of the logomark that
corresponds to the guidelines, it's not the fault of other groups for
using the only version that's there.