I'll agree - although it is not really a bone of contention for me personally, the 'unserif-ized' I is much cleaner looking. And though it would be able to be mistaken for a lowercase L - although the lower l in this font is differentiated, it's not immediately obvious - I'd say the cases where confusion could be a real issue aren't common, and easily (?) avoided in a titling font.

Also, the word jumbling is really fun, but it's not quite as easy as you might think. ;) I thought this was interesting: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,511177,00.html

On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 15:02 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@gmail.com> wrote:

Nope, I also think the "I" is a bit off in this font. Besides, "l"
already has a more subtle, but fitting, hint of serifs.

I so completely agree with that! :)

That gibberish thing was actually something I learned in a Phonetics class. Of course I've forgotten what that phenomenon is actually called. LOL.

design-team mailing list