Máirín Duffy (duffy(a)fedoraproject.org) said:
On Thu 04 Apr 2013 09:41:14 AM EDT, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It's a fair policy, although given that this is merely using the logos
> present in the fedora-logos package as-is (as I understand from Ryan's
> mail), I don't know that this counts as modification.
It does; the context in which the logo is displayed is dictated by the
guidelines just as much as the actual logo graphics themselves. A
specific example of this is the clearspace rule in the logo usage
guidelines. For a specific example - the logo used here has no TM.
There are (very few) contexts in which it's probably okay and we've
gotten appropriate permission to display the logo without a TM, but
it's pretty obvious no such permission was sought when using the
TM-less logo in this instance.
What I'm trying to say is that if the logo requires a TM to be used, the
logo in the fedora-logos package should have it - the expectation would
be that the logos in that package are the proper ones to use without