On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:28:33AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 07/13/2010 12:54 AM, Cata wrote:
> These fonts, have accents?
Some. For example Comfortaa and Cantarell has ăâî but it does not have
țș, Driod seems to have ș but still no ț.
Unfortunately MgOpen Modata is worse (nothing), Liberation Sans was
patched only recently and DejaVu is too generic.
I saw this on the Cantarell site as well, which gave me pause:
"Since the design was tested mainly when displayed on-screen at small
sizes, the printed output (especially of the bold and oblique) does
not work well. I hope to publish a final release that is tuned to the
needs of printing in the future."
If we're planning to use these fonts in printed material, should the
printed output be a consideration? How does Cantarell fare in
comparison with something like Droid Sans?
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com