Okay, I am assuming then since you haven't indicated otherwise that it
is okay to move forward with the design we'd already worked out, so as
noted above I'll update the ticket with that and take ownership for
getting Ben's final approval on the logo specifically.
Tickets are already open, a while ago, but stop until logo is aproved by
Ben.
> > All those tickets are already open (a while ago) and communication
> > happens since tickets send a reminder through mail and IRC :)
> It seems a lot of discussion has been happening about this
(and other
> fudcon-related projects) outside of the ticket system so the automated
> ticket comment notifications would not have been much help. (I'm just as
> guilty of this as anybody else.)
Not too much really, with FUDcon
India I have been only help, local team has
done everything, same with Milan. With Blacksburg we have time, but things
have been a bit rush (for logo and after people give their feedback) flyers
since Ben want to make a campaing at Vtec fast (a couple in fact).
Same with other meetings, everyone is invited as I said, I have only been
atent to other tasks since mine where finish or solved by other team
members.
> Should we be treating the ticket system as the canonical place to have
> discussions then? I see discussions scattered across this mailing list,
> IRC, other mailing lists, and even Google Docs (I think this is a very
> bad habit and is not open source)... it makes it harder for folks to
> participate or even just follow along when it's not clear what's going
> on and where it's happening.
That's Milans particular issue, even if everyone wanted to dialogue with
them and make them use the regular channels, has been almost imposible. I
only got Samuele to send a mail to all mail list after he went back from
vacations, updates are on the mail list already. The rest has been openly,
and I hope Blacksburg be too.
> Do folks get ticket mails for all team tickets or only the
tickets
> they're cc'ed on? (If the latter that solution could be an issue?)
> What does everybody else think?
> > Be the owner of a ticket doesn't mean that is the
only one that can do
> > it, once again, that's why we are a team.... right?
> It doesn't. It does mean, however, the person who owns
the ticket should
> be communicated with so we're all on the same page and don't duplicate
> efforts. A ticket-owner doesn't necessarily have to be the one doing the
> artwork but I think they should be the one pushing the project forward
> and making sure it happens at the very least; if that isn't happening
> though, and there's a ticket you're interested in working on, it's good
> to reassign the ticket to yourself (after communicating with the ticket
> owner) so folks know it's not neglected. We can work as a team when
> playing ball, but not everyone can hold the ball at the same time!
Yeah, that's why I have post
everymail list, blogs and more, to get feedback
beyond our mail list, tickets and more. Once again, I'm sorry if I made a
mistake.
> > We do what we can mo :)
> Much appreciated.
> ~m
>
_______________________________________________
> design-team mailing list
> design-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
--
tatica
Maria Gracia Leandro
http://www.tatica.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:tatica
LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56