Okay, I am assuming then since you haven't indicated otherwise that it
is okay to move forward with the design we'd already worked out, so as
noted above I'll update the ticket with that and take ownership for
getting Ben's final approval on the logo specifically.
Tickets are already open, a while ago, but stop until logo is aproved by Ben.
> All those tickets are already open (a while ago) and communication
> happens since tickets send a reminder through mail and IRC :)
It seems a lot of discussion has been happening about this (and other
fudcon-related projects) outside of the ticket system so the automated
ticket comment notifications would not have been much help. (I'm just as
guilty of this as anybody else.)
Not too much really, with FUDcon India I have been only help, local team has done everything, same with Milan. With Blacksburg we have time, but things have been a bit rush (for logo and after people give their feedback) flyers since Ben want to make a campaing at Vtec fast (a couple in fact).
Same with other meetings, everyone is invited as I said, I have only been atent to other tasks since mine where finish or solved by other team members.
Should we be treating the ticket system as the canonical place to have
discussions then? I see discussions scattered across this mailing list,
IRC, other mailing lists, and even Google Docs (I think this is a very
bad habit and is not open source)... it makes it harder for folks to
participate or even just follow along when it's not clear what's going
on and where it's happening.
That's Milans particular issue, even if everyone wanted to dialogue with them and make them use the regular channels, has been almost imposible. I only got Samuele to send a mail to all mail list after he went back from vacations, updates are on the mail list already. The rest has been openly, and I hope Blacksburg be too.
Do folks get ticket mails for all team tickets or only the tickets
they're cc'ed on? (If the latter that solution could be an issue?)
What does everybody else think?
> Be the owner of a ticket doesn't mean that is the only one that can do
> it, once again, that's why we are a team.... right?
It doesn't. It does mean, however, the person who owns the ticket should
be communicated with so we're all on the same page and don't duplicate
efforts. A ticket-owner doesn't necessarily have to be the one doing the
artwork but I think they should be the one pushing the project forward
and making sure it happens at the very least; if that isn't happening
though, and there's a ticket you're interested in working on, it's good
to reassign the ticket to yourself (after communicating with the ticket
owner) so folks know it's not neglected. We can work as a team when
playing ball, but not everyone can hold the ball at the same time!
Yeah, that's why I have post everymail list, blogs and more, to get feedback beyond our mail list, tickets and more. Once again, I'm sorry if I made a mistake.
> We do what we can mo :)
Much appreciated.