Ah okay. I think the reason this is becoming a firedrill now whereas it never was before
is that this hasnt always been an alpha criterion, maybe only the past 2-3 releases.
Traditionally we'd considered ourselves in super bonus awesome shape if we had
something for alpha; we shifted our schedule earlier to do this regularly to get more
feedback on the artwork.
~m
On March 21, 2016 4:27:48 PM EDT, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:08:12PM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> The artwork was ready to go during my leave (3 weeks agi) so I'm not
> sure what broke down here - I checked before the readiness meeting
> and the packages had been built. So what exactly is the issue?
It seems like the maintainers of the other packages
(e.g. desktop-backgrounds) that enable the default backgrounds in the
various desktop environments weren't aware they needed to update their
packages. A couple people told me they thought this had happened in
the last release, although I don't recall it specifically. So I'm
just looking for a way that everyone involved could get notified at
the right time to do their part.
That being said, Ray Strode had an idea that might make a fallback
easy for later releases:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319865
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com
_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/design-team@lists.fedoraprojec...
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.