Open source alternative to Adobe Flash - synfig

[Valent Turkovic]

http://synfig.org/Gallery#Videos

This synfig demos look amazing, any plans to package it for Fedora?

[Michael Beckwith]

On 06/17/2009 12:14 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> http://synfig.org/Gallery#Videos
>
> This synfig demos look amazing, any plans to package it for Fedora?

Hard to tell, I know I've brought it up before but didn't put a lot of 
emphasis on it.

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

On 06/17/2009 10:14 AM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> http://synfig.org/Gallery#Videos
>
> This synfig demos look amazing, any plans to package it for Fedora?

ffmpeg requirement might a blocker for Fedora repository unless someone 
can build it by removing it. Meanwhile the site has already a rpm 
package so a potential upstream maintainer seems to be possible.

Luya

[Muayyad AlSadi]

> ffmpeg requirement might a blocker for Fedora repository unless someone

it can be built without ffmpeg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568

but the problem that it kept crashing on my PC

some one gave me an rpm with all deps library included in it, that one
did not crash.

I wonder what was the problem, I'm still puzzled

maybe I would retry it in F11

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

On 06/17/2009 12:20 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> > ffmpeg requirement might a blocker for Fedora repository unless someone
>
> it can be built without ffmpeg
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
>
> but the problem that it kept crashing on my PC
>
> some one gave me an rpm with all deps library included in it, that one
> did not crash.
>
> I wonder what was the problem, I'm still puzzled

Which architecture did you use for testing? I am currently trying 
upstream version on my LT20 (Pentium M) and will try on my x86_64 
desktop. Apparently, the traceback occurs on x86_64.

Luya

[Muayyad AlSadi]

no my trace backs where on i686

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

On 06/17/2009 12:58 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> no my trace backs where on i686
> _______________________________________________
> design-team mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

Could you send me the x86 built package? I don't have access to my 
desktop and my notebook is slow to rebuild (Pentium M 1.5 Ghz).

I have tested upstream version which is fine.

Luya

[Muayyad AlSadi]

if you mean this the one advertised here
http://synfig.org/Download

http://download.tuxfamily.org/morevna/morevnapackage/binaries/0.61.09/synfig...

or the svn one on this blog

in this blog you can find the one with all libs
http://zelgadis.profusehost.net/blog/2009/03/24/synfig-06109-svn-2354/

http://download.tuxfamily.org/morevna/morevnapackage/binaries/synfigstudio-0...

then this is the one I said to have all deps included
just notice the output of rpm -qlp file.rpm
it includes gtk+ and imagemagick and many other libraries

---
I wonder where did the reviewed .spec had gone

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

On 06/17/2009 03:06 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> if you mean this the one advertised here
> http://synfig.org/Download
>
> http://download.tuxfamily.org/morevna/morevnapackage/binaries/0.61.09/synfig...
>
> or the svn one on this blog
>
> in this blog you can find the one with all libs
> http://zelgadis.profusehost.net/blog/2009/03/24/synfig-06109-svn-2354/
>
> http://download.tuxfamily.org/morevna/morevnapackage/binaries/synfigstudio-0...
>
> then this is the one I said to have all deps included
> just notice the output of rpm -qlp file.rpm
> it includes gtk+ and imagemagick and many other libraries
>
> I wonder where did the reviewed .spec had gone
> _______________________________________________
> design-team mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

I mean the spec version used for reviewing in Fedora.
Thanks,

Luya