Fedora flatpak remote is not GPG verified
by Michal Konecny
Hi,
I recently started using Fedora flatpak remote in Fedora 30 Silverblue,
but now I'm facing issue with GPG verification.
I didn't had any issue when installing the application from the remote
few days ago, but when I'm trying to do `flatpak update` I'm getting
"Error: Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote"
Why the flatpak remote is not GPG signed? Or is there another issue?
Regards,
mkonecny
P.S.: I sent the same message to Fedora devel mailing list, but because
there is no response I'm sending it also to Fedora desktop mailing list.
4 years, 4 months
Call For Test Days for Fedora 31!
by Sumantro Mukherjee
Hi Fedora users, developers and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 31.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users and developers
together to test a specific feature or area of the distribution. You can
run a Test Day on just about anything for which it would be useful to do
some fairly focused testing in 'real time' with a group of testers; it
doesn't have to be code, for instance, we often run Test Days for
l10n/i18n topics. For more information on Test Days, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days .
Anyone who wants to can host their own Test Day, or you can request that
the QA group helps you out with organization or any combination of the
two. To propose a Test Day, just file a ticket in fedora-qa pagure - here's
an example https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/583 . For
instructions on hosting a Test Day, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/SOP_Test_Day_management .
You can see the schedule at <goog_29817696>
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issues?tags=test+days .
There are many slots open right now. Consider the development schedule
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/Schedule>, though, in deciding
when
you want to run your Test Day - for some topics you may want to avoid
the time before the Beta release or the time after the feature freeze
or the Final Freeze.
We normally aim to schedule Test Days on Thursdays; however, if you want
to run a series of related Test Days, it's often a good idea to do
something like Tuesday / Wednesday / Thursday of the same week (this is
how we usually run the X Test Week, for instance). If all the Thursday
slots fill up but more people want to run Test Days, we will open up
Tuesday slots as overflows. And finally, if you really want to run a
Test Day in a specific timeframe due to the development schedule, but
the Thursday slot for that week is full, we can add a slot on another
day. We're flexible! Just put in your ticket the date or timeframe you'd
like, and we'll figure it out from there.
If you don't want to run your own Test Day, but you are willing to help
with another, feel free to join one or more of already accepted Test Days:
2019-04-30 Fedora Media Writer Test Day
GNOME Test Day
Silverblue Test Day*
i18n Test Day*
Kernel Test Week*
Upgrade Test Day*
And don't be afraid, there are lot of more slots available for your own
Test Day!
[*] These are the test days we run generally to make sure everything is
working fine, the dates get announced as we move into release cycle.
If you have any questions about the Test Day process, please don't
hesitate to contact me or any member of the Fedora QA team on test at
lists.fedoraproject.org or in #fedora-qa on IRC. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Sumantro
Fedora QE
--
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED <https://redhat.com/trusted>
4 years, 5 months
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!
by Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 08:27 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
>
> Forgot to mention. The fedora desktop logo (bottom right by default) does not
> appear correctly in many cases. This looks like yet another issue with GNOME
> fractal scaling and will likely take a while to sort out. Those who cannot live
> with it can always disable the 'Fedora logo' via the GNOME weak tool.
Yeah, I've noticed that too, just never got around to filing a bug on
it yet as there've been more important things to deal with. I'm not
sure what the cause is.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
4 years, 5 months
REMINDER: What's new in F30 Workstation article for Fedora Magazine
by Ben Cotton
According to the schedule, I'm supposed to remind you wonderful people
to be getting the "What's new in F30 Workstation" article ready for
Fedora Magazine. Consider yourselves reminded.
The target release date for Fedora 30 is 30 April, with an alternate of 7 May.
--
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Pronouns: he/him
4 years, 5 months
Workstation Working Group - Call for participation
by Owen Taylor
Due to schedule constraints and other time commitments, Rex Dieter and
Paul Frields are looking to step down from the Working Group. We
really appreciate the work that Rex and Paul have put in over the last
several years! So, we're looking for at least two new members. If we
have more than two good candidates, we'll consider increasing the size
of the WG.
The basic goal of the Workstation Working Group is to move forward the
Workstation Edition of Fedora forward - the WG is responsible for
making sure we ship a polished product, for making decisions about
proposed technical changes that are specific to the Workstation, and
for setting the overall direction for future development of the
Workstation Edition. There is a particular emphasis at the moment on
the Silverblue project - on making Fedora work great as an image and
container based operating system.
Responsibilities of a WG member are:
* Attend and participate in bi-weekly IRC meetings. Currently these
are at 13:00 UTC on Mondays - the day and (to some extent) the time
will be reconsidered when we have a final composition.
* Take action items at the meetings and follow up - actions usually
involve communication and research.
* Follow issues reported against
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/, and bring things that come to
your attention that need working group attention there.
We'd like the new members to increase the diversity of viewpoints
represented in the working group. So, we'd especially encourage
participation from people, who meet some of the following criteria:
* From groups underrepresented in Free and Open Source Software
* Not working for Red Hat
* Not directly working on the GNOME desktop
If you are interested in joining the Working Group team, or think you
might be interested and have questions, please mail me privately or
follow up here.
Thanks!
Owen Taylor <otaylor(a)redhat.com>
4 years, 5 months
Workstation WG meeting recap 2018-Jul-30
by Owen Taylor
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-04-22/workstation...
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-04-22/workstation...
Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-04-22/workstation...
=================================
#fedora-meeting-2: workstation_wg
=================================
Meeting started by mcatanzaro at 13:06:04 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-04-22/workstation...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll call (mcatanzaro, 13:06:31)
* LINK:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_holidays_in_the_European_Union
<-- so it is (mcatanzaro, 13:20:40)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting
(otaylor, 13:23:09)
* LINK: http://whenisgood.net/7gh3jsg/results/qsbi72b - can people see
that? (otaylor, 13:28:34)
* Clearing up Monday meeting time for the moment (stickster, 13:29:05)
* LINK: http://whenisgood.net/7gh3jsg/results/qsbi72b (bcotton,
13:31:00)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation (otaylor,
13:53:47)
* ACTION: otaylor a) post a call for participation on the desktop@
mailing list (maybe on the silverblue forum too) b) reach out to
the people above [Chris, Sinny, Sanja, Stephen, Langdon] to see if
they are interested (stickster, 14:00:05)
Meeting ended at 14:01:34 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* otaylor a) post a call for participation on the desktop@ mailing list
(maybe on the silverblue forum too) b) reach out to the people above
[Chris, Sinny, Sanja, Stephen, Langdon] to see if they are interested
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* otaylor
* otaylor a) post a call for participation on the desktop@ mailing
list (maybe on the silverblue forum too) b) reach out to the people
above [Chris, Sinny, Sanja, Stephen, Langdon] to see if they are
interested
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* mcatanzaro (55)
* stickster (34)
* otaylor (26)
* petersen (20)
* zodbot (13)
* langdon (13)
* bcotton (4)
* mboddu (2)
* cschalle (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
4 years, 5 months
