On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Thomas Gilliard <satellitgo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 01/14/2016 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 05:27 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2015-August/0016...
>>>>
>>>> Stephen Gallagher has proposed a Change for Server to drop i686 media
>>>> for F24. Given our previous list discussion, this is something for
>>>> which we should probably follow suit. Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
>>>
>>> I wonder if this discussion (archive here [1]) had any conclusion? I
>>> just noticed that the Server SIG's proposal is in the F24 ChangeSet [2],
but
>>> it is not the case for Workstation. If you plan to drop i686 medium, there
>>> are 12 more days until the proposal submission deadline [3].
>>
>> FESCo voted that no i686 media will block the release from F24 and
>> forward, so it doesn't make much sense to generate it.
>
> Well, whenever I've seen it discussed, there's been an understanding
> that there's a difference there; we do ship a lot of non-release-
> blocking media, after all. The idea was that declaring that i686 media
> are not blocking is less drastic than out-and-out dropping them, and
> gives WGs / SIGs the power to choose whether they want to keep shipping
> the images or not. So I'd say you still have a choice to make here: do
> you want to keep producing non-blocking 32-bit Workstation media in a
> sort of 'here they are if you REALLY want them' way, or just stop
> producing them entirely?
>
> I don't think they'll stop being produced/shipped unless you
> specifically ask releng to stop producing them, and it might be nice to
> have that tracked as a Change or similar indeed.
soas uses i686 media ...
The Sugar on a Stick spin is an entirely separate spin from
Workstation and therefore not relevant to this particular discussion.
josh