On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:04:04AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:48:34AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 04/06/2010 05:00 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >>
> >> But, compared to gwibber, this seems to be a much better choice for our
> >> livecd. So, a (weak) +1 from me...
> >
> > Thanks. I have forwarded this feedback to the upstream developer of
> > Pino and will file tickets if required. Meanwhile I have become
> > co-maintainer of Pino in Fedora and will push forward updates as
> > necessary. Any further comments from others on including Pino by
> > default?
>
> Does Pino plan to add other social media sites like Facebook? That's
> one reason that I use Gwibber... Other than the UI issues I don't see
> any reason not to include Pino by default, although if we have to
> downsize the Live media back to CD size I wouldn't worry about keeping
> Pino.
My sentiments too, more or less. I'm disappointed that
Status.net/identi.ca isn't supported out of the box by Pino, which
weakens my support somewhat.
Yeah, the lack of identi.ca & facebook support weakens my support as
well.
I think instead of trying to replace Gwibber, we should take a good hard
look at their (Ubuntu's) desktop-couch vision, and really see if it is
something we want to leverage (as they are putting a lot of resources
into it). If not, we should patch this requirement out of Gwibber,
because afaik, it isn't using the couchdb for anything at the moment.
luke