Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/28/2014 10:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:11:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process
> > unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The only
> > benefit I can think of to separating them would be metrics, and I
> > cannot measure the degree to which I don't care about metrics :)
>
> I think we should care about metrics, and I think this would be
> very useful to track, even though I agree it'd be better to combine
> into one actual process at this point.

I specifically meant "metrics about whether issues are specific to one
Fedora release or another". I should probably start drinking coffee.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlOF+dMACgkQeiVVYja6o6PNfACeJ3aXX+JLc9AC9zisDeaU5KnH
> EAYAn3nRkFpJnGyLpMoySeh5Yyxmz5Lk
> =aucv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----